News

Republican-controlled US House sets contempt vote for attorney general

WASHINGTON: The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives is expected to vote on Wednesday (Jun 12) on whether to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for refusing to turn over audio recordings of a special counsel interview with Democratic President Joe Biden.

The Department of Justice said it has already turned over a transcript of the interview, which set off a political firestorm in February when Special Counsel Robert Hur released a report describing Biden, 81, as a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory”.

The White House has asserted that the recordings are covered by executive privilege, and a vote by the House to hold Garland in contempt would put the Justice Department in the awkward position of having to decide whether to prosecute its own leader. It is not required to take up the charges.

Hur had investigated Biden after classified documents dating to his time as vice president from 2009-2017 were found improperly stored in his home and office, and said that he had declined to prosecute the president both because he had cooperated with the probe and because he would present a sympathetic face to a jury.

Biden’s rival in the Nov 5 election, Republican Donald Trump, has been criminally charged for mishandling classified documents after his 2017-2021 term in the White House, though unlike Biden, Trump refused requests to return the documents.

Congressional Democrats have alleged that Republicans want the audio to use in campaign ads for Trump.

Garland has repeatedly accused House Republicans of impugning the Justice Department’s integrity and pushing false narratives that could put career civil servants in danger.

“There have been a series of unprecedented and, frankly, unfounded attacks on the Justice Department,” Garland told reporters in May. “We have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committees get responses to their legitimate requests, but this is not one.”

Trump, who was convicted in May by a jury for falsifying business records, faces three state and federal criminal cases, including one centered around his own alleged mishandling of classified documents.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button